An idling resource represents an asynchronous operation whose results affect subsequent operations in a UI test. By registering idling resources with Espresso, you can validate these asynchronous operations more reliably when testing your app.
Identify when idling resources are needed
Espresso provides a sophisticated set of
synchronization capabilities. This
characteristic of the framework, however, applies only to operations that post
messages on the MessageQueue
, such as a subclass of
View
that's drawing its contents on the screen.
Because Espresso isn't aware of any other asynchronous operations, including those running on a background thread, Espresso can't provide its synchronization guarantees in those situations. In order to make Espresso aware of your app's long-running operations, you must register each one as an idling resource.
If you don't use idling resources when testing the results of your app's asynchronous work, you might find yourself having to use one of the following bad workarounds to improve your tests' reliability:
- Adding calls to
Thread.sleep()
. When you add artificial delays to your tests, it takes longer for your test suite to finish executing, and your tests might still fail sometimes when executed on slower devices. In addition, these delays don't scale well, as your app might have to perform more time-consuming asynchronous work in a future release. - Implementing retry wrappers, which use a loop to repeatedly check whether your app is still performing asynchronous work until a timeout occurs. Even if you specify a maximum retry count in your tests, each re-execution consumes system resources, particularly the CPU.
- Using instances of
CountDownLatch
, which allow one or more threads to wait until a specific number of operations being executed in another thread are complete. These objects require you to specify a timeout length; otherwise, your app might be blocked indefinitely. The latches also add unnecessary complexity to your code, making maintenance more difficult.
Espresso allows you to remove these unreliable workarounds from your tests and instead register your app's asynchronous work as idling resources.
Common use cases
When performing operations similar to the following examples in your tests, consider using an idling resource:
- Loading data from the internet or a local data source.
- Establishing connections with databases and callbacks.
- Managing services, either using a system service or an instance of
IntentService
. - Performing complex business logic, such as bitmap transformations.
It's especially important to register idling resources when these operations update a UI that your tests then validate.
Example idling resource implementations
The following list describes several example implementations of idling resources that you can integrate into your app:
CountingIdlingResource
- Maintains a counter of active tasks. When the counter is zero, the associated
resource is considered idle. This functionality closely resembles that of a
Semaphore
. In most cases, this implementation is sufficient for managing your app's asynchronous work during testing. UriIdlingResource
- Similar to
CountingIdlingResource
, but the counter needs to be zero for a specific period of time before the resource is considered idle. This additional waiting period takes consecutive network requests into account, where an app in your thread might make a new request immediately after receiving a response to a previous request. IdlingThreadPoolExecutor
- A custom implementation of
ThreadPoolExecutor
that keeps track of the total number of running tasks within the created thread pools. This class uses aCountingIdlingResource
to maintain the counter of active tasks. IdlingScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
- A custom implementation of
ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
. It provides the same functionality and capabilities as theIdlingThreadPoolExecutor
class, but it can also keep track of tasks that are scheduled for the future or are scheduled to execute periodically.
Create your own idling resource
As you use idling resources in your app's tests, you might need to provide custom resource management or logging. In those cases, the implementations listed in the previous section might not suffice. If that's the case, you can extend one of these idling resource implementations or create your own.
If you implement your own idling resource functionality, keep the following best practices in mind, particularly the first one:
- Invoke transitions to the idle state outside idle checks.
- After your app becomes idle, call
onTransitionToIdle()
outside any implementations ofisIdleNow()
. That way, Espresso doesn't make a second, unnecessary check to determine whether a given idling resource is idle.
The following code snippet illustrates this recommendation:
Kotlin
fun isIdle() { // DON'T call callback.onTransitionToIdle() here! } fun backgroundWorkDone() { // Background work finished. callback.onTransitionToIdle() // Good. Tells Espresso that the app is idle. // Don't do any post-processing work beyond this point. Espresso now // considers your app to be idle and moves on to the next test action. }
Java
public void isIdle() { // DON'T call callback.onTransitionToIdle() here! } public void backgroundWorkDone() { // Background work finished. callback.onTransitionToIdle() // Good. Tells Espresso that the app is idle. // Don't do any post-processing work beyond this point. Espresso now // considers your app to be idle and moves on to the next test action. }
- Register idling resources before you need them.
The synchronization benefits associated with idling resources only take effect following Espresso's first invocation of that resource's
isIdleNow()
method.The following list shows several examples of this property:
- If you register an idling resource in a method annotated with
@Before
, the idling resource takes effect in the first line of each test. - If you register an idling resource inside a test, the idling resource takes effect during the next Espresso-based action. This behavior still occurs even if the next action is in the same test as the statement that registers the idling resource.
- If you register an idling resource in a method annotated with
- Unregister idling resources after you're done using them.
To conserve system resources, you should unregister idling resources as soon as you don't need them anymore. For example, if you register an idling resource in a method annotated with
@Before
, it's best to unregister this resource in a corresponding method that's annotated with@After
.- Use an idling registry to register and unregister idling resources.
By using this container for your app's idling resources, you can register and unregister idling resources repeatedly as needed and still observe consistent behavior.
- Maintain only simple app state within idling resources.
For example, the idling resources that you implement and register shouldn't contain references to
View
objects.
Register idling resources
Espresso provides a container class into which you can place your app's idling
resources. This class, called
IdlingRegistry
, is a
self-contained artifact that introduces minimal overhead to your app. The class
also allows you to take the following steps toward improving your app's
maintainability:
- Create a reference to the
IdlingRegistry
, instead of the idling resources that it contains, in your app's tests. - Maintain differences in the collection of idling resources that you use for each build variant.
- Define idling resources in your app's services, rather than in the UI components that reference those services.
Integrate idling resources into your app
Although you can add idling resources to an app in several different ways, one approach in particular maintains encapsulation for your app while still allowing you to specify a particular operation that a given idling resource represents.
Recommended approach
When adding idling resources into your app, we highly recommend placing the idling resource logic in the app itself and performing only the registration and unregistration operations in your tests.
Although you create the unusual situation of using a test-only interface in production code by following this approach, you can wrap idling resources around code that you already have, maintaining your app's APK size and method count.
Alternative approaches
If you'd prefer to not have idling resources logic in your app's production code, there are several other viable integration strategies:
- Create build variants, such as Gradle's product flavors, and use idling resources only in your app's debug build.
- Use a dependency injection framework like Dagger to inject your app's idling resource dependency graph into your tests. If you're using Dagger 2, the injection itself should originate from a subcomponent.
Implement an idling resource in your app's tests, and expose the part of your app's implementation that needs to be synchronized in those tests.
Caution: Although this design decision seems to create a self-contained reference to idling resources, it also breaks encapsulation in all but the simplest of apps.
Additional resources
For more information about using Espresso in Android tests, consult the following resources.
Samples
- IdlingResourceSample: Synchronization with background jobs.