Modifications de comportement : applications ciblant Android 14 ou version ultérieure

Comme les versions précédentes, Android 14 apporte des modifications de comportement pouvant affecter votre application. Les modifications de comportement suivantes s'appliquent exclusivement aux applications qui ciblent Android 14 (niveau d'API 34) ou version ultérieure. Si votre application cible Android 14 ou une version ultérieure, vous devez la modifier pour qu'elle prenne en charge ces comportements, le cas échéant.

Veillez également à consulter la liste des modifications de comportement qui affectent toutes les applications exécutées sur Android 14, peu importe la targetSdkVersion de l'application.

Fonctionnalité de base

Le type de service au premier plan doit être indiqué

If your app targets Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, it must specify at least one foreground service type for each foreground service within your app. You should choose a foreground service type that represents your app's use case. The system expects foreground services that have a particular type to satisfy a particular use case.

If a use case in your app isn't associated with any of these types, it's strongly recommended that you migrate your logic to use WorkManager or user-initiated data transfer jobs.

Application de l'autorisation BLUETOOTH_CONNECT dans BluetoothAdapter

Android 14 enforces the BLUETOOTH_CONNECT permission when calling the BluetoothAdapter getProfileConnectionState() method for apps targeting Android 14 (API level 34) or higher.

This method already required the BLUETOOTH_CONNECT permission, but it was not enforced. Make sure your app declares BLUETOOTH_CONNECT in your app's AndroidManifest.xml file as shown in the following snippet and check that a user has granted the permission before calling getProfileConnectionState.

<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.BLUETOOTH_CONNECT" />

Mises à jour OpenJDK 17

Android 14 continues the work of refreshing Android's core libraries to align with the features in the latest OpenJDK LTS releases, including both library updates and Java 17 language support for app and platform developers.

A few of these changes can affect app compatibility:

• Changes to regular expressions: Invalid group references are now disallowed to more closely follow the semantics of OpenJDK. You might see new cases where an IllegalArgumentException is thrown by the java.util.regex.Matcher class, so make sure to test your app for areas that use regular expressions. To enable or disable this change while testing, toggle the DISALLOW_INVALID_GROUP_REFERENCE flag using the compatibility framework tools.
• UUID handling: The java.util.UUID.fromString() method now does more strict checks when validating the input argument, so you might see an IllegalArgumentException during deserialization. To enable or disable this change while testing, toggle the ENABLE_STRICT_VALIDATION flag using the compatibility framework tools.
• ProGuard issues: In some cases, the addition of the java.lang.ClassValue class causes an issue if you try to shrink, obfuscate, and optimize your app using ProGuard. The problem originates with a Kotlin library that changes runtime behaviour based on whether Class.forName("java.lang.ClassValue") returns a class or not. If your app was developed against an older version of the runtime without the java.lang.ClassValue class available, then these optimizations might remove the computeValue method from classes derived from java.lang.ClassValue.

JobScheduler renforce le comportement des rappels et du réseau

Since its introduction, JobScheduler expects your app to return from onStartJob or onStopJob within a few seconds. Prior to Android 14, if a job runs too long, the job is stopped and fails silently. If your app targets Android 14 (API level 34) or higher and exceeds the granted time on the main thread, the app triggers an ANR with the error message "No response to onStartJob" or "No response to onStopJob".

This ANR may be a result of 2 scenarios: 1. There is work blocking the main thread, preventing the callbacks onStartJob or onStopJob from executing and completing within the expected time limit. 2. The developer is running blocking work within the JobScheduler callback onStartJob or onStopJob, preventing the callback from completing within the expected time limit.

To address #1, you will need to further debug what is blocking the main thread when the ANR occurs, you can do this using ApplicationExitInfo#getTraceInputStream() to get the tombstone trace when the ANR occurs. If you're able to manually reproduce the ANR, you can record a system trace and inspect the trace using either Android Studio or Perfetto to better understand what is running on the main thread when the ANR occurs. Note that this can happen when using JobScheduler API directly or using the androidx library WorkManager.

To address #2, consider migrating to WorkManager, which provides support for wrapping any processing in onStartJob or onStopJob in an asynchronous thread.

JobScheduler also introduces a requirement to declare the ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE permission if using setRequiredNetworkType or setRequiredNetwork constraint. If your app does not declare the ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE permission when scheduling the job and is targeting Android 14 or higher, it will result in a SecurityException.

API de lancement des tuiles

Pour les applications ciblant l'âge de 14 ans ou plus, TileService#startActivityAndCollapse(Intent) est obsolète et génère désormais une exception lorsqu'elle est appelée. Si votre application lance des activités à partir de cartes, utilisez plutôt TileService#startActivityAndCollapse(PendingIntent).

Confidentialité

Accès limité aux photos et aux vidéos

Android 14 introduces Selected Photos Access, which allows users to grant apps access to specific images and videos in their library, rather than granting access to all media of a given type.

This change is only enabled if your app targets Android 14 (API level 34) or higher. If you don't use the photo picker yet, we recommend implementing it in your app to provide a consistent experience for selecting images and videos that also enhances user privacy without having to request any storage permissions.

If you maintain your own gallery picker using storage permissions and need to maintain full control over your implementation, adapt your implementation to use the new READ_MEDIA_VISUAL_USER_SELECTED permission. If your app doesn't use the new permission, the system runs your app in a compatibility mode.

Expérience utilisateur

Notifications d'intent plein écran sécurisées

Avec Android 11 (niveau d'API 30), toutes les applications pouvaient utiliser Notification.Builder.setFullScreenIntent pour envoyer des intents plein écran lorsque le téléphone était verrouillé. Vous pouvez l'accorder automatiquement lors de l'installation de l'application en déclarant l'autorisation USE_FULL_SCREEN_INTENT dans le fichier AndroidManifest.

Les notifications d'intent plein écran sont conçues pour les notifications à priorité très élevée nécessitant l'attention immédiate de l'utilisateur, comme les appels entrants ou les paramètres d'alarme configurés par l'utilisateur. Pour les applications ciblant Android 14 (niveau d'API 34) ou version ultérieure, seules les applications qui proposent des fonctionnalités d'appel et d'alarmes peuvent utiliser cette autorisation. Le Google Play Store révoque les autorisations USE_FULL_SCREEN_INTENT par défaut pour toutes les applications qui ne correspondent pas à ce profil. La date limite pour appliquer ces modifications est le 31 mai 2024.

Cette autorisation reste activée pour les applications installées sur le téléphone avant que l'utilisateur passe à Android 14. Les utilisateurs peuvent activer et désactiver cette autorisation.

Vous pouvez utiliser la nouvelle API NotificationManager.canUseFullScreenIntent pour vérifier si votre application dispose de l'autorisation. Sinon, votre application peut utiliser le nouvel intent ACTION_MANAGE_APP_USE_FULL_SCREEN_INTENT pour afficher la page des paramètres où les utilisateurs peuvent accorder l'autorisation.

Sécurité

Restrictions concernant les intents implicites et en attente

For apps targeting Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, Android restricts apps from sending implicit intents to internal app components in the following ways:

• Implicit intents are only delivered to exported components. Apps must either use an explicit intent to deliver to unexported components, or mark the component as exported.
• If an app creates a mutable pending intent with an intent that doesn't specify a component or package, the system throws an exception.

These changes prevent malicious apps from intercepting implicit intents that are intended for use by an app's internal components.

For example, here is an intent filter that could be declared in your app's manifest file:

<activity
    android:name=".AppActivity"
    android:exported="false">
    <intent-filter>
        <action android:name="com.example.action.APP_ACTION" />
        <category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT" />
    </intent-filter>
</activity>

If your app tried to launch this activity using an implicit intent, an ActivityNotFoundException exception would be thrown:

// Throws an ActivityNotFoundException exception when targeting Android 14.
context.startActivity(Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION"))

// Throws an ActivityNotFoundException exception when targeting Android 14.
context.startActivity(new Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION"));

To launch the non-exported activity, your app should use an explicit intent instead:

// This makes the intent explicit.
val explicitIntent =
        Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION")
explicitIntent.apply {
    package = context.packageName
}
context.startActivity(explicitIntent)

// This makes the intent explicit.
Intent explicitIntent =
        new Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION")
explicitIntent.setPackage(context.getPackageName());
context.startActivity(explicitIntent);

Les broadcasts receivers enregistrés lors de l'exécution doivent spécifier le comportement d'exportation

Apps and services that target Android 14 (API level 34) or higher and use context-registered receivers are required to specify a flag to indicate whether or not the receiver should be exported to all other apps on the device: either RECEIVER_EXPORTED or RECEIVER_NOT_EXPORTED, respectively. This requirement helps protect apps from security vulnerabilities by leveraging the features for these receivers introduced in Android 13.

Exception for receivers that receive only system broadcasts

If your app is registering a receiver only for system broadcasts through Context#registerReceiver methods, such as Context#registerReceiver(), then it shouldn't specify a flag when registering the receiver.

Chargement de code dynamique plus sécurisé

If your app targets Android 14 (API level 34) or higher and uses Dynamic Code Loading (DCL), all dynamically-loaded files must be marked as read-only. Otherwise, the system throws an exception. We recommend that apps avoid dynamically loading code whenever possible, as doing so greatly increases the risk that an app can be compromised by code injection or code tampering.

If you must dynamically load code, use the following approach to set the dynamically-loaded file (such as a DEX, JAR, or APK file) as read-only as soon as the file is opened and before any content is written:

val jar = File("DYNAMICALLY_LOADED_FILE.jar")
val os = FileOutputStream(jar)
os.use {
    // Set the file to read-only first to prevent race conditions
    jar.setReadOnly()
    // Then write the actual file content
}
val cl = PathClassLoader(jar, parentClassLoader)

File jar = new File("DYNAMICALLY_LOADED_FILE.jar");
try (FileOutputStream os = new FileOutputStream(jar)) {
    // Set the file to read-only first to prevent race conditions
    jar.setReadOnly();
    // Then write the actual file content
} catch (IOException e) { ... }
PathClassLoader cl = new PathClassLoader(jar, parentClassLoader);

Handle dynamically-loaded files that already exist

To prevent exceptions from being thrown for existing dynamically-loaded files, we recommend deleting and recreating the files before you try to dynamically load them again in your app. As you recreate the files, follow the preceding guidance for marking the files read-only at write time. Alternatively, you can re-label the existing files as read-only, but in this case, we strongly recommend that you verify the integrity of the files first (for example, by checking the file's signature against a trusted value), to help protect your app from malicious actions.

Restrictions supplémentaires concernant le démarrage d'activités en arrière-plan

For apps targeting Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, the system further restricts when apps are allowed to start activities from the background:

• When an app sends a PendingIntent using PendingIntent#send() or similar methods, the app must opt in if it wants to grant its own background activity launch privileges to start the pending intent. To opt in, the app should pass an ActivityOptions bundle with setPendingIntentBackgroundActivityStartMode(MODE_BACKGROUND_ACTIVITY_START_ALLOWED).
• When a visible app binds a service of another app that's in the background using the bindService() method, the visible app must now opt in if it wants to grant its own background activity launch privileges to the bound service. To opt in, the app should include the BIND_ALLOW_ACTIVITY_STARTS flag when calling the bindService() method.

These changes expand the existing set of restrictions to protect users by preventing malicious apps from abusing APIs to start disruptive activities from the background.

Traversée de répertoire ZIP

Pour les applications ciblant Android 14 (niveau d'API 34) ou version ultérieure, Android empêche la faille de traversée de répertoire ZIP de la manière suivante : ZipFile(String) et ZipInputStream.getNextEntry() génèrent un ZipException si les noms des entrées de fichiers ZIP contiennent ".." ou commencent par "/".

Les applications peuvent désactiver cette validation en appelant dalvik.system.ZipPathValidator.clearCallback().

Consentement de l'utilisateur requis pour chaque session de capture MediaProjection

For apps targeting Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, a SecurityException is thrown by MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay in either of the following scenarios:

• Your app caches the Intent that is returned from MediaProjectionManager#createScreenCaptureIntent, and passes it multiple times to MediaProjectionManager#getMediaProjection.
• Your app invokes MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay multiple times on the same MediaProjection instance.

Your app must ask the user to give consent before each capture session. A single capture session is a single invocation on MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay, and each MediaProjection instance must be used only once.

Handle configuration changes

If your app needs to invoke MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay to handle configuration changes (such as the screen orientation or screen size changing), you can follow these steps to update the VirtualDisplay for the existing MediaProjection instance:

1. Invoke VirtualDisplay#resize with the new width and height.
2. Provide a new Surface with the new width and height to VirtualDisplay#setSurface.

Register a callback

Your app should register a callback to handle cases where the user doesn't grant consent to continue a capture session. To do this, implement Callback#onStop and have your app release any related resources (such as the VirtualDisplay and Surface).

If your app doesn't register this callback, MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay throws an IllegalStateException when your app invokes it.

Mise à jour des restrictions non SDK

Android 14 inclut des listes à jour d'interfaces non SDK limitées grâce à la collaboration avec les développeurs Android et aux derniers tests internes. Dans la mesure du possible, nous nous assurons que des alternatives publiques sont disponibles avant de limiter les interfaces non SDK.

Si votre application ne cible pas Android 14, certaines de ces modifications ne vous affecteront peut-être pas immédiatement. Cependant, bien que vous puissiez actuellement utiliser certaines interfaces non SDK (en fonction du niveau d'API cible de votre application), l'utilisation d'un champ ou d'une méthode non SDK présente toujours un risque élevé d'endommager votre application.

Si vous n'êtes pas sûr que votre application utilise des interfaces non SDK, vous pouvez tester votre application pour le savoir. Si votre application repose sur des interfaces non SDK, vous devriez commencer à planifier une migration vers des alternatives SDK. Nous comprenons néanmoins que certaines applications ont des cas d'utilisation valides pour utiliser des interfaces non SDK. Si vous ne trouvez pas d'alternative à l'utilisation d'une interface non SDK pour une fonctionnalité de votre application, vous devriez demander une nouvelle API publique.

Pour en savoir plus sur les modifications apportées à cette version d'Android, consultez la section Mises à jour des restrictions d'interface non SDK dans Android 14. Pour en savoir plus sur les interfaces non SDK en général, consultez la section Restrictions concernant les interfaces non SDK.