Android Bench
AI-assisted software engineering has seen the emergence of several benchmarks to measure the capabilities of LLMs. Android developers face specific challenges that aren't covered by existing benchmarks, so we created one that focuses on a north star of high quality Android development.
Notice: We've updated Android Bench. To learn more about the updates check out our blog and methodology.
| Model | Score (%) Average percentage of 100 test cases successfully resolved across 10 runs for each model |
arrow_range
Cl range (%)
Expected performance range, reflecting the results' statistical reliability (p-value < 0.05)
|
Avg latency (h)
Average time taken to solve 100 tasks across 10 runs
|
Avg cost ($)
Average cost per full benchmark run
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
84.5 | 79.9 — 88.8 | 8.0 | $133.2 |
|
|
80.2 | 73.5 — 86.6 | 11.4 | $138.3 |
|
|
76.2 | 69.0 — 82.1 | 12.3 | $99.9 |
|
|
74.1 | 66.0 — 80.9 | 8.4 | $83.4 |
|
|
73.7 | 66.1 — 80.4 | 10.6 | $87.4 |
|
|
72.4 | 65.8 — 79.3 | 6.7 | $88.0 |
|
|
72.2 | 65.3 — 78.7 | 38.9 | $117.0 |
|
|
71.1 | 63.6 — 78.2 | 28.3 | $165.6 |
|
|
70.4 | 63.2 — 77.0 | 31.8 | $48.1 |
|
|
68.7 | 60.9 — 76.4 | 7.0 | $96.5 |
|
|
67.6 | 60.2 — 74.3 | 57.2 | $49.4 |
|
|
67.0 | 58.3 — 75.4 | 16.9 | $127.6 |
|
|
63.6 | 56.3 — 70.3 | 26.0 | $41.7 |
|
|
63.2 | 56.0 — 71.3 | 17.6 | $53.5 |
|
|
62.5 | 54.2 — 70.0 | 13.1 | $30.1 |
|
|
60.8 | 53.1 — 68.3 | 13.6 | $9.2 |
|
|
59.5 | 51.7 — 66.9 | 9.0 | $3.7 |
|
|
57.7 | 49.5 — 65.5 | 18.5 | $18.6 |
|
|
54.7 | 46.6 — 62.8 | 8.9 | $1.5 |
|
|
54.2 | 46.3 — 61.8 | 14.2 | $58.3 |
|
|
45.1 | 38.2 — 53.0 | 25.8 | $97.3 |
|
|
41.6 | 34.4 — 49.0 | 18.2 | $14.9 |
|
|
37.0 | 29.5 — 44.4 | 16.3 | $17.8 |
|
|
36.3 | 29.3 — 43.2 | 38.9 | $10.6 |
|
|
25.1 | 18.6 — 31.8 | 21.4 | $3.3 |
Latest results as of
July 8th.
View archived leaderboards and check back periodically for updates.
View archived leaderboards and check back periodically for updates.
Latest Updates
Track the latest AI model benchmarks, newly introduced agent architectures, and continuous performance evaluations on the platform. Stay updated with our routine methodology updates and release logs.
-
New updates • Jul 8th
Dataset available on Harbor
-
New models • Jul 8th
Claude Fable 5, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 4.8
-
New models • Jul 8th
Qwen 3.7 Max, Qwen 3.7 Plus
-
New models • Jul 8th
GLM 5.2
-
New models • Jul 8th
Kimi K2.7 Code
-
New models • Jul 8th
MiniMax M3
-
Archived models • Jul 8th
Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.5
-
Archived models • Jul 8th
GPT OSS 120B, GPT OSS 20B
-
Archived models • Jul 8th
Qwen 3.5 9B, Qwen 3.6 Max Preview
-
New updates • Jul 8th
We have migrated our benchmark framework to Harbor
-
New updates • Jul 8th
We've updated Android Bench
-
New models • Jun 9th
Gemini 3.5 Flash
-
Archived models • Jun 9th
Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.5
-
Archived models • Jun 9th
GPT 5.3 Codex, GPT 5.2 Codex
-
Archived models • Jun 9th
Gemini 3 Pro Preview, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash
-
New updates • Jun 9th
See our new Archive page
Learn more about Android Bench
Our methodology
Learn more about how we created a set of common Android developer tasks.
Android best practices
Many of the tasks are based on how we define high quality Android development, which is detailed in our developer documentation.
Harbor dataset
See the full dataset on Harbor dashboard.